Privacy and Security in Federated Cloud Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15662/IJARCST.2022.0505001Keywords:
Federated Cloud Environments, Privacy, Security, Identity Federation (SAML, OIDC), Security-as-aService, Data-centric Security, Accountability, InteroperabilityAbstract
Federated cloud environments—interconnected cloud systems across multiple providers—offer enhanced scalability, resource sharing, and resilience. However, they introduce complex privacy and security challenges due to heterogeneity, distributed control, and multi-party trust dependencies. This paper conducts a structured analysis of privacy and security in federated clouds using pre-2019 literature. Key challenges include disparate interfaces, identity and access federation, data protection across domains, interoperable security policies, and accountability. Operating across varied administrative domains undermines uniform enforcement of confidentiality, integrity, data sovereignty, and compliance. We review technologies such as federated identity protocols (SAML, OIDC), dynamic Security-as-a-Service models for multi-cloud protection, and data-centric security models that emphasize data control over infrastructure protection. Our methodology synthesizes security frameworks, compares identity federation models (direct vs. brokered authentication), and evaluates enforcement strategies in distributed settings. Findings underscore identity and policy federation as critical, while dynamic, service-based security provisioning (Security-as-a-Service) can offer adaptable defenses. Yet, challenges like provider heterogeneity, network interoperability, compliance bounds, and lack of central oversight complicate implementation. We propose a deployment workflow: define federation boundaries and policies → establish federated identity/auth → implement dynamic Security-as-a-Service components → apply data-centric protections (encryption, masking, access control) → monitor and audit across domains → iterate policy and trust relationships. Advantages include improved scalability, vendor flexibility, and shared resilience; disadvantages involve increased attack surface, management complexity, and potential trust breaches. We conclude that securing federated clouds demands integrated identity federation, adaptive security services, and data-centric controls. Future efforts should focus on automated trust negotiation, standardized federation policies, and distributed ledger–based accountability mechanisms.
References
1. Ficco, M., Rak, M., Luna, J., Suri, N., Panica, S., Petcu, D. (2012). Security Issues in Cloud Federations. In Achieving Federated and Self-Manageable Cloud Infrastructures ResearchGateIGI Global.
2. Explored identity patterns and concerns: direct vs. brokered federation (SAML, OIDC) PMC.
3. Enteros blog: complexity of database security, compliance across federated cloud environments Enteros, Inc.
4. Security-as-a-Service dynamic provisioning in federated clouds, Fed4FIRE experiments SpringerLink.
5. Data-centric security principles emphasizing data-level controls Wikipedia.
6. EU strategies for trusted federated cloud and data protection frameworks post-PRISM WIREDWikipedia.
7. Federated cloud accountability considerations SpringerLink.


