AI-Driven Compliance Audits: Enhancing Regulatory Adherence in Financial and |Legal Sectors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15662/IJARCST.2023.0605004Keywords:
RegTech, Natural Language Processing (NLP), Anomaly Detection, Explainable AI (XAI), Automated Auditing, Regulatory ComplianceAbstract
AI-based compliance auditing leverages machine learning, natural language processing (NLP), and automation to identify regulatory breaches, pull out evidentiary matter, and deliver audit findings faster and more consistently. This paper suggests a hybrid compliance-audit model that integrates transformer-based NLP for contract and regulation interpreting, supervised anomaly detection with the transaction and reporting stream, and explainability layer mapping model outputs to regulation clauses and audit trails. The framework was applied to a corpus of synthesized and de-identified real financial transaction logs, regulatory filings, and contracts (N ≈ 1.2M records; 12K contract sections). Approaches for this included fine tuning pretrained legal transformers, gradient boosted anomaly detectors on engineered features to perform transaction monitoring and a rule based mapping module that transformed model signals into audit evidence. Performance was tested on three audit tasks: Contract-clause compliance identification, Anomalous transaction detection for regulatory reporting, and Evidence extraction for the audit trails. Results observed average task-level F1 scores of 0.88 (A), 0.84 (B), and 0.81 (C); precision/recall tradeoffs could be engineered to reflect organisational risk appetites. Traceability to regulation clauses measurable increased human auditor validation rate by up to 42% in a controlled study. The false positive rates were decreased by 31% in transaction detection under the same sensitivity level than baseline heuristics. The research shows that hybrid AI + rules approaches can make a significant improvement in the efficiency and regulation aliment of auditing while offering audit trails necessary for governance. Drawbacks are the representativeness of the dataset, human-in-the-loop validation of high-risk decisions.References
1. Ahmed, A. A. A., Agarwal, S., Kurniawan, I. G. A., Anantadjaya, S. P. D., & Krishnan, C. (2022). Business boosting through sentiment analysis using artificial intelligence approach. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 13(1), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01594-x
2. Cardoni, A., Kiseleva, E., & De Luca, F. (2020). Continuous auditing and data mining for strategic risk control and anticorruption: Creating “fair” value in the digital age. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3072–3085. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2558
3. Brown, J., & Williams, R. (2021). AI-driven GDPR compliance automation: A case study of European tech firms. Journal of Data Privacy and Law, 18(3), 112-134.
4. Smith, A., & Johnson, R. (2022). Regulatory challenges in AI-driven compliance: An emerging issue. Harvard Law Review, 135(6), 298-317.
5. Chen, L., Zhang, Y., & Li, M. (2020). Algorithmic bias in AI compliance: Evidence from fintech firms. Journal of AI Ethics and Regulation, 5(2), 89-107.
6. Gonzalez, P., & Fernandez, R. (2022). AI-powered legal analytics in corporate governance. Brazilian Journal of Corporate Law, 10(1), 77-92.
7. Johnson, M. T. (2022). AI and Compliance: A New Frontier for Corporate Governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(4), 629-645.
8. Jones, T., Smith, K., & Lee, J. (2021). Transparency and bias in AI-driven compliance: A critical analysis. Business & Society, 34(3), 112-129.
9. Kagan, R. A., & Scholz, J. T. (2021). Compliance, Regulation, and the Future of Legal Enforcement. Law & Society Review, 55(1), 1-28.
10. Elahi, E., Khalid, Z., Tauni, M. Z., Zhang, H., and Lirong, X. (2021a). Extreme Weather Events Risk to Crop-Production and the Adaptation of Innovative Management Strategies to Mitigate the Risk: A Retrospective Survey of Rural Punjab. Pakistan: Technovation, 102255.
11. Lou, Q. (2021). Changes and Changes of Company Law under the Background of Blockchain Technology Application [J]. Secur. Mark. Her. (9).
12. Wang, Q. (2019). Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of blockchain as a governance mechanism and legal challenges [J]. Soc. Sci. Res. (4).
13. Gasser, U., & Schmitt, C. (2019). The role of professional norms in the governance of artificial intelligence. In M. D. Dubber, F. Pasquale, & S. Das (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethics and AI (forthcoming)). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2020). Competing in the age of AI. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
15. John B. Power, “Exploratory Analysis of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Impact and Opportunities for Financial Services Compliance,” Dissertations, Wilmington University, pp. 1-24, 2022.
16. B. Narsimha et al., “Cyber Defense in the Age of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Financial Fraud Detection Application,” International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 87-92, 2022.
17. Rodriguez, M. (2022). NLP in contract compliance: A legal-tech innovation. Spanish Journal of Legal Studies, 11(3), 132-147.


